Page 06 · Testing Process
Quality, gated at every step
A layered test strategy with explicit quality gates before any merge to main or promotion to production.
Testing strategy
| Test type | Scope | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Unit Testing | Individual functions and modules | Development team · min 80% coverage |
| Integration Testing | API endpoints, database, service interactions | QA team |
| Functional Testing | End-to-end business workflows | QA team |
| Regression Testing | Ensure changes don't break existing functionality | QA team |
| Performance Testing | Load testing against defined benchmarks | QA team |
| Security Testing | SAST via SonarQube | QA team |
| User Acceptance Testing | End-to-end business workflows | Client with QA support |
Critical test workflows
- 01Registration and login (all user types)
- 02Vehicle / VIN input and part identification
- 03RFQ submission and distribution
- 04RFQ routing and retailer notifications
- 05Quotation submission and comparison
- 06Order placement and confirmation
- 07Delivery status updates
- 08Payment processing & status tracking (COD and online)
- 09Return and refund workflows
- 10Admin monitoring and management
Quality gates
Code Review
At least 2 approvals before merge
Unit Tests
Pass with min 80% coverage
Integration Tests
All critical-path tests pass
Regression Tests
No critical / high severity bugs
Performance Test
Within defined benchmarks
Security Scan
No critical / high severity vulnerabilities
Test environment: isolated DB, mocked external services (VIN decoding, payment-gateway sandbox).